...to Publicy and returns...
"As my experience shows, people are willing to give their location if they know they'll get something for it."
Open Society and Culture ...a CGI ant carrying a digital grain of rice...
"As my experience shows, people are willing to give their location if they know they'll get something for it."
Posted by
William Meloney
at
5:30 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
8:41 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
7:32 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
12:02 PM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
11:33 AM
0
comments
No longer a fan of something? Facebook just made it easier to “unlike” your favorite Facebook Pages through the embedded fan box widgets. While many users have actually requested that Facebook a full functioning “Dislike” feature to express negative sentiment, this feature is simply an easier way to not be a fan of existing Facebook Pages that you like.
Why Facebook would add the unlike button is unknown but many Facebook Page owners have been complaining to us about the feature this morning. Previously, it was pretty difficult to “unfan” (now called “unlike”) Facebook Pages from external websites and even within the Facebook Page itself.
Posted by
William Meloney
at
4:17 PM
0
comments
. . .
RABINOWITZ: But some Kent State University students, like Max Dunzik(ph), question whether they're being saturated with observances of an event that's no longer relevant.
Mr. MAX DUNZIK (Student, Kent State University): It starts to lose its luster after a while. Maybe like every 10, it's sweet, but the 41st, the 42nd, the 43rd, the 44th, like after a while, it's like okay, we get it.
. . .
Posted by
William Meloney
at
12:27 PM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
8:34 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
11:35 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
8:00 AM
0
comments
... while limiting the users' options to control their own information. AND, coercing with threats of loss of friendship and not belonging. If you think I am being extreme try Deactivating your Facebook account. Read and internalize the last screen of coercion that FB slaps you with. AND after I did deactivate my FB account the I got the real surprise ... My account is not accessible to me, as I have deactivated it, but it is still accessible to everyone INSIDE the walled garden of Facebook. So much for "deactivation". Sooooo, I have investigated Terminating my Facebook account. First you have to log into Facebook (which among other things re-activates your account - if you have deactivated it - and displays a "Welcome back" message - more friendship and belonging coercion.) Once back in you have to go to this link location: http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account Once there you must "Submit" ...then provide your password, again (like you weren't logged in in order to get to this place.) THEN you have to answer the Captcha "What are these two words" requirement. THEN you have to wait two weeks (without logging into Facebook - which would negate your "termination order".) Can you say emotional and psychological manipulation? Some of history's most despicable despots have used more humane methods of torturing their prisoners.So, I love all of my friends and most of my enemies BUT I will no longer be held hostage by Facebook. If you feel inclined to respond to any of this please send me an e-mail at wmeloney at gmail dot com as I will not be able to see anything that you post in FB.Thanks - BillWilliam "Papa" MeloneyFacebook Privacy Policy circa December 2009:
Certain categories of information such as your name, profile photo, list of friends and pages you are a fan of, gender, geographic region, and networks you belong to are considered publicly available to everyone, including Facebook-enhanced applications, and therefore do not have privacy settings. You can, however, limit the ability of others to find this information through search using your search privacy settings.
Current Facebook Privacy Policy, as of April 2010:
When you connect with an application or website it will have access to General Information about you. The term General Information includes your and your friends’ names, profile pictures, gender, user IDs, connections, and any content shared using the Everyone privacy setting. ... The default privacy setting for certain types of information you post on Facebook is set to “everyone.” ... Because it takes two to connect, your privacy settings only control who can see the connection on your profile page. If you are uncomfortable with the connection being publicly available, you should consider removing (or not making) the connection.
Viewed together, the successive policies tell a clear story. Facebook originally earned its core base of users by offering them simple and powerful controls over their personal information. As Facebook grew larger and became more important, it could have chosen to maintain or improve those controls. Instead, it's slowly but surely helped itself — and its advertising and business partners — to more and more of its users' information, while limiting the users' options to control their own information.
Posted by
William Meloney
at
9:46 AM
1 comments
Apple May Be Gunning for Open Source Codecs
from GigaOM by Ryan Lawler
The latest indication that Apple is trying to strong-arm publishers to adopt HTML5 and H.264 came today, as Steve Jobs reportedly claimed by email that a patent pool was being assembled to “go after” Ogg Theora and other open source codecs.
Posted by
William Meloney
at
8:56 AM
0
comments
Lin was once a devoted supporter of the Chinese Communist Party and participated in the Land Reform. When she was studying in the Peking University, she sided with CCP leader Peng Dehuai's camp criticizing Mao Zedong's extremism in the Great Leap Forward and People's Commune Movement and was then labelled as an anti-revoluntionary rightist.
One of the poems devoted to her prosecutor by Lin under the series “Roses devoted to the Prosecutor”:
将这一滴注入祖国的血液里,
将这一滴向挚爱的自由献祭。
揩吧!擦吧!洗吧!
这是血呢!
殉难者的血迹,
谁能抹得去?
Posted by
William Meloney
at
8:02 AM
0
comments
Big Business Starts Chewing on the Professional ClassHaving starved the lower economic classes and decimated the middle classes, pushing them into the lower strata through a combination of rich-favoring tax policy, wage intimidation, off-shoring jobs, and outright theft, Big Business has begun to move its attention to ripping off the upper classes, starting with its own professionals.
Posted by
William Meloney
at
5:35 AM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
6:54 PM
0
comments
Sony Japan has said it will cease production of floppy disks next year.
Posted by
William Meloney
at
12:32 PM
0
comments
I, Standards Body
from Scripting News
On my drive east earlier this month I read a bunch of audio books, including Isaac Asimov's I, Robot. It's basically a collection of short stories built around the assumption that we create robots that obey three laws at their core.
. . .
It struck me, thinking about how the W3C and IETF are controlled by the big tech companies, and how they serve their interests, often in conflict with the interests of users, that perhaps a new kind of standards body is needed. One which never takes money from tech companies, and has its own version of the three laws.
The restated laws:
1. A standard may not injure users or, through inaction, allow users to come to harm.
2. Standard-compliant software must obey any orders given to it by users, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A standard must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.Dave Winer's next line really struck a harmonic chord with me, "Users are supreme. Tech companies are not even part of the charter of a human-serving standards body. They may use the standards, but we don't care one way or the other if they continue to profit, or even exist."
Posted by
William Meloney
at
4:51 PM
0
comments
Posted by
William Meloney
at
7:00 AM
2
comments